Science v Philosophy

http://en.paperblog.com/birds-get-silly-making-fun-of-humans-193335/

Any friendly philosophers or scientists fancy getting together for a discussion on G+ Hangouts in the next few days?

UPDATE: The Hangout is planned for 21/2/2013 1730 GMT. Comment here or tweet @tom_hartley for an invitation. You will need to provide your preferred gmail address (but you should do this privately, e.g., by twitter DM or by adding me on G+).

The long-standing but largely dormant tension between Philosophy and Science has been bubbling up recently, stoked in part by a discussion between Lawrence Krauss and Julian Baggini and others who have been arguing about the boundaries of their respective disciplines.

At the same time some (notably Casadevall and Fang, discussed here) argue that science itself is in crisis and have prescribed Philosophy as part of the solution – though not in my poll scientists agreed with this point.

I can see both sides of this, and I have a nagging feeling that Philosophy still has a great deal to contribute to Science (or should it be vice-versa). But, at least where I have worked, there’s been relatively little contact between scientists and philosophers, so is it worth trying to bridge this widening divide?

I think a Google+ Hangout might be a good start. Is anyone with me?

About these ads

About tomhartley

Neuroscientist and University Lecturer in Psychology

4 responses to “Science v Philosophy”

  1. asehelene says :

    I’d love to. I do the science, but I teach the theory of science classes at our masters level (and read stuff there for fun – I’m sure people here would understand : ) ). As always, depends on when etc. This week is one of those intense teaching weeks (but, also one where the classes are philosophy of science. Embodiment next).

    • tomhartley says :

      My intial thought is early evening UK time (say 1730 GMT) either 20-22 Feb or some time on Saturday if other times aren’t good. Will set up doodle poll if there is sufficient interest.

  2. Alan Winfield (@alan_winfield) says :

    I share your view Tom about how much science and philosophy can benefit from each other. I’ve always viewed them as two sides of the same coin. In fact I regard robotics as experimental philosophy (of the kind championed by Dan Dennett).

    Be very happy to join a discussion. If early evening then could make 21st.

  3. Tim Dean says :

    Sounds terrific. However, that’ll be the rather early down here – 4.30am in Sydney. Be interested to see what emerges from the discussion though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,358 other followers

%d bloggers like this: